You can download and open this file to your own computer but DRM prevents opening this file on another computer, including a networked server. PDF Price. Not a Member? This standard is not included in any packages. We have no amendments or corrections for this standard. A short summary of this paper. An AIAG publication is intended as a guide to aid the manufacturer, the consumer and the general public. The existence of an AIAG publication does not in any respect preclude anyone from manufacturing, marketing, purchasing, or using products, processes, or procedures not conforming to the publication.
Please refer to the Maintenance Request Form at the back of this document to submit a request. Copyright is not claimed as to any part of an original work prepared by a U. All rights are preserved by AIAG, and content may not be altered or disseminated, published, or transferred in part of such content.
The information is not to be sold in part or whole to anyone within your organization or to another company. Copyright infringement is a violation of federal law subject to criminal and civil penalties. Effective management of process capability requires the identification of sources of both special and common cause variation. Once the sources are identified, corrective actions designed to address them must be effectively implemented and sustained. Employees do not refer to instructions or procedures before every step of a process; they often complete the processes by memory, which comes from repeating and practicing each step many times over.
Once necessary process changes are identified, employees must re-learn and adjust. However, it is very easy for employees to return to the old, familiar methods.
Before , DaimlerChrysler and General Motors required different process review approaches, including different approaches for Layered Process Audits. One of the principal purposes of industry standard practices is to address commonly observed issues that are not isolated to any one company, commodity, or process within the industry. Validation of process improvements and corrective actions is one commonly observed industry issue that can be directly improved by the use of Layered Process Audits, which are designed for this specific purpose.
Layered Process Audits require that multiple operational levels within a manufacturing facility review the same key operational controls that ensure product quality.
Controlling quality at multiple operational levels is a key strength of Layered Process Audits. CQI-8 2 Issue: 1.
CQI-8 3 Issue: 1. Effective management of process compliance requires the identification of sources of both special and common cause variation. Examples of special cause variation might include failure of one shift of personnel to follow the prescribed process. Examples of common cause variation might include an inadequate FMEA for the manufacturing process.
Once the sources are identified, the corrective actions designed to address them must be effectively implemented and sustained.
Employees typically do not refer to instructions or procedures before every step of a process; they often complete the processes by memory, which comes from repeating and practicing each step many times over. It is very easy for them to return to the old, familiar methods.
There might even be perceived incentives in place to follow the "tried and true" previous processes, even though studies have shown that the "tried and true" processes were not adequate to meet customer requirements. Purpose of This Guideline Layered Process Audits reduce variation along the manufacturing line and up through the ranks of plant management. However, if each customer OEM developed its own Layered Process Audit method, the effectiveness overall would be reduced.
The basic approach for the Audits is an established concept; therefore, there is no competitive advantage for any particular OEM to develop a custom approach. The competitive advantage, though, could lie in the chosen application of the common Audit approach.
The concepts behind Layered Process Audits are not new. They find their origin in the well-known Plan- Do-Check-Act continuous improvement cycle. This Guideline is not designed to introduce any significant improvements in the technology or application methodology of Layered Process Audits. It is designed to provide a common framework of the definitions and standard approaches that can be adopted by any automotive OEM or supplier to an OEM tier 1 , at any depth in the supply chain any tier.
Each organization may choose to develop specific requirements for Layered Process Audits, for example, the frequency of the audits or the minimum topics to be included in the question sets. Such specific requirements will augment the suggested framework defined by this Guideline. CQI-8 6 Issue: 1. It is recommended that a training program for Layered Process Audit auditors be based on material in this Guideline starting with this section.
Layered Process Audits require that multiple operational levels within a manufacturing facility review the same key operational controls within the reviewer's span of authority that ensure product quality. NOTE: While this Guideline describes the common fundamental requirements that DaimlerChrysler and General Motors have agreed upon, each company might have specific requirements such as particular processes audited, reporting format, audit maintenance, etc.
Table 1A lists the commonly defined steps. Table 1A. Typical Steps for Developing and Implementing Audits A cross-functional team identifies existing key process steps to audit. These are selected based on risk to product quality including lessons learned, safety, criticality of process step, or product characteristic.
Layered Process Audit items can also include past non-conformances, past customer returns, and past customer complaints. Layered Process Audits conducted in manufacturing facilities are owned by Manufacturing Management. Layered Process Audits reinforce existing processes and requirements and are not intended to develop pilot or draft processes.
Layered Process Audits are short in duration and are conducted according to a regular, planned cadence with specific criteria for frequency. Multiple levels of plant personnel audit the manufacturing process to the same questions; delegating is not acceptable. Audit results are recorded consistently, including corrective actions, and summarized for senior management review.
Areas audited are appropriate to the span of authority of the level of person auditing. The higher the level of management conducting the audit, the greater the span of control and therefore the number of audit items can increase. The multiple levels of plant personnel that audit must do so with a standard, common set of questions. Layered Audits are not intended to have multiple layers of management measure part characteristics.
If you need to purchase multiple copies, you can place the orders under each individual end-user's account, or call our Customer Service Department for assistance. You will need to place a separate order for this item. We apologize for the inconvenience. Additional Information. Or call Copyright infringement is a violation of federal law subject to criminal and civil penalties. Effective management of process capability requires the identification of sources of both special and common cause variation.
Once the sources are identified, corrective actions designed to address them must be effectively implemented and sustained. Employees do not refer to instructions or procedures before every step of a process; they often complete the processes by memory, which comes from repeating and practicing each step many times over. Once necessary process changes are identified, employees must re-learn and adjust.
However, it is very easy for employees to cqo-8 to the old, familiar methods. BeforeDaimlerChrysler and General Motors required different process review guidelins, including different approaches for Layered Process Audits. One of the principal purposes of industry standard practices is to address commonly observed issues that are not isolated to any one company, commodity, or process within the industry. Validation of process improvements and corrective actions is one commonly observed industry issue that can be directly improved by the use of Layered Process Audits, which are designed for this specific purpose.
Layered Process Audits require that multiple operational levels within a manufacturing facility review the same key operational controls that ensure product quality. Controlling quality at multiple operational levels is a key strength of Layered Process Audits. Effective management of process compliance requires the identification of sources of both special and common cause variation. Examples of special cause variation might include failure of one shift of personnel to follow the prescribed process.
Examples of common cause variation might include an inadequate FMEA for the manufacturing process. Once the sources are identified, the corrective actions designed to address them must be effectively implemented and sustained. Employees typically do not refer to instructions or procedures before every step of a process; they often complete the processes by memory, which comes from repeating and practicing each step many times over.
It is very easy for them to return to the old, familiar methods. Purpose of This Guideline Layered Process Audits reduce variation along the manufacturing line and up through the ranks of plant management. However, if each customer OEM developed its own Layered Process Audit method, the effectiveness overall would be reduced.
The basic approach for the Audits is an established concept; therefore, there is no competitive advantage for any particular OEM to develop a custom approach. The competitive advantage, though, could lie in the chosen application of the common Audit approach. The concepts behind Layered Process Audits are not new. They find their origin in the well-known PlanDo-Check-Act continuous improvement cycle. This Guideline is not designed to introduce any significant improvements in the technology or application methodology of Layered Process Audits.
It is designed to provide a common framework of the definitions and standard approaches that can be adopted by any automotive OEM or supplier to an OEM tier 1at any depth in the supply chain any tier. Each organization ausits choose to develop specific requirements for Layered Process Audits, for example, auditw frequency of the audits or the minimum topics to be included in the question sets.
0コメント